SASK - “Woman must repay money stolen from work”

Saskatchewan News Network; Regina Leader-Post, Saturday, January 05, 2008

http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/news/local/story.html?id=39ec23e5-89a7-4128-a78b-2d1985697ff6

REGINA (SNN) — A 44-year-old woman has been spared a jail term for stealing more than $130,000 from two First Nations
organizations over a period of several years.

But Agnes Worme will still pay a significant price for her crime.

On Thursday, Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Ian McLellan gave Worme an 18-month conditional sentence, the first nine months
of which will be served under house arrest in the community. Worme will also have to pay back all the money she took by
making payments of $500 a month, and contributing her entire residential school settlement when she receives it.

Worme pleaded guilty in December to stealing a total of more than $130,000 from the Kawacatoose First Nation and the
Saskatchewan Indian Cultural Centre in Saskatoon. She took the money through multiple transactions while working in
high-ranking positions with the organizations between 2002 and 2005.

Worme stole $79,000 from the Kawacatoose First Nation while working as a financial manager between January 2002 and June 2004.

…………

At the time of her guilty plea, court heard that the stolen money went toward bills, purchases, hotels and purchases at Casino Regina.
Worme didn’t have a previous criminal record, but was addicted to drugs and gambling at the time.

The Crown had been seeking a jail sentence for the thefts, but the defence argued for a community-based term.

Court heard that Worme turned to drugs and gambling after a series of deaths in the family.

But McLellan said she has since made significant changes in her life, including marrying a man who doesn’t drink, gamble or do drugs.

Cont.

Posted: January 5, 2008 Comments (0)

SASK - “Gaming profits lawsuit dismissed”

http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/news/story.html?id=fc0b8443-3720-4ad0-977d-4d800da53d6a

Lori Coolican, Saskatchewan News Network; CanWest News Service, Thursday, September 27, 2007, Regina Leader Post

SASKATOON — A Queen’s Bench justice has dismissed a multi-million-dollar lawsuit brought against the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations and the provincial government by the Battlefords Tribal Council over control of gaming profits from the Gold Eagle Casino.

The lawsuit relied on the provisions of the Non-Profit Corporations Act, which governs registered charitable organizations including the BTC and the Federation of Saskatchewan Indians, Inc. (FSI, Inc.) — a non-profit corporation established in 1966, long before the advent of the FSIN in the 1980s.

The FSIN’s Chiefs-in-Assembly voted this spring to replace the BTC with a new entity, the Battlefords Agency Tribal Chiefs, Inc. (BATC), as the host tribal council for the casino amid allegations that the BTC lacked transparency in its financial decisions.

That vote was not on the legislative assembly’s agenda for the meeting, and the BTC chiefs were not notified it was coming, according to an affidavit sworn by Wayne Semaganis, director of economic development and gaming for the BTC, in connection with the lawsuit.

“The matter arose out of nowhere during the legislative assembly on the afternoon of May 30, 2007,” Semaganis alleged.

The BTC’s membership is comprised of four First Nations: Little Pine, Lucky Man, Poundmaker Cree and Mosquito Grizzly Bear’s Head Lean Man. The BATC was formed by the Sweetgrass, Red Pheasant and Moosomin First Nations after they withdrew their membership from the BTC earlier this year.

© The Leader-Post (Regina) 2007

Posted: September 29, 2007 Comments (0)

SASK - 121st Editon : On Line Review (June 20,07)

The Problem Gambling Community Program purpose is to strengthen the
capacity of communities to respond to the negative impacts of
gambling. The program works in collaboration with Saskatchewan Health
to assist in the delivery of the public education and community
development components of Saskatchewan’ s problem gambling program.

121st Edition: U.S., Europe and Antigua Tangle, Professional Gamblers
and NCRG Conference

1) Ohio Ban

Ohio state’s democratic governor, Ted Strickland, has asked the GOP
controlled legislature to ban cash payouts from gaming machines, which
are increasingly popping up around the state.

http://tinyurl. com/248nmf

The twists and turns of state legislatures and their dance with
lobbyists come to mind as we read the op.ed. piece on the
bucyrustelegraphfor um.com site.

http://tinyurl. com/2erv4s

2) A Touch of History from a Professional. . . Gambler not Historian

Ted Sevransky began betting on sports regularly when he held a job
managing a sports bar in 1992. He moved to Las Vegas to bet on sports
as a full time professional in 1998.

The allure of the life of a professional gambler is often glamorized.
Yes, there are those who can succeed in the `profession. ‘ However it
is important to recognize the difference between fact and fiction.
The costs of the lifestyle can be high and losses must also be cited
hand in hand with wins.

He provides his caustic perspective on the UIGEA (Unlawful Internet
Gambling Enforcement Act).

http://tinyurl. com/yuuwtg

3) 8th Annual NCRG Conference on Gambling and Addiction
Paris Las Vegas Resort Las Vegas
November 11-13, 2007

The NCRG Conference will test conventional wisdom about how to best
protect those most vulnerable from developing gambling disorders and
how to provide those who do develop problems with effective means of
recovery.

http://tinyurl. com/2fo6rw

4) EU Takes on the U.S.

The European Union told the U.S. June 19 that it wanted compensation
for a U.S. foreign online gambling sites ban that doesn’t comply with
global trade rules.

The E.U. - the world’s largest consumer market - joins the tiny
Caribbean nation of Antigua and Barbuda in seeking compensation. The
twin-island nation argued that online gambling had provided income for
hundreds of its citizens and was helping to end its reliance on
tourism, which was hurt by a series of hurricanes in the late 1990s.

http://tinyurl. com/yp8kd7

) Antigua Tenacity Continues: Challenges U.S.

Antigua and Barbuda said June 20 that it was entitled to $3.44 billion
in compensation from the United States in a World Trade Organization
dispute over a U.S. ban on Internet gambling. The compensation demand
would be enforced as Antigua withdrew intellectual property protection
for U.S. trademarks, patents and industrial designs, the government said.
“We feel we have no other choice in the matter, we have fought long
and hard for fair access to the U.S. market and have won at every
stage of the WTO process,” Errol Cort, Antigua’s finance minister, said.
After losing the case at the WTO, Washington announced that it would
take the unprecedented legal step of changing the international
commitments it made as part of a 1994 treaty regulating trade in
services among the 150 members of the WTO. As a result, Washington
declined to challenge the WTO ruling, because it says that its legal
maneuver effectively ends the case.
Ed. Note: How convenient it is to change the rules of the game midstream.
http://tinyurl. com/yq2oj2

Posted: June 24, 2007 Comments (0)

SASK - “Gaming” LTE

Letter The Leader-Post, Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Where is the money? In its May 8 edition, the Leader-Post had a section on SIGA (Saskatchewan Indian Gaming Authority) casinos.

I live on the White Bear First Nation. Where is the money that is supposed to go back to the community? The programs do not exist and, if they do, what are they? Why is the reserve only getting paid $42,000 for lease rights for the next 10 years? Why are there no reporters talking to the everyday people where the casinos are? How come the White Bear casino will not hire its own people?

What happened to the nation that is to look after its own?

Claudette Parisien, Carlyle

© The Leader-Post (Regina) 2007

© 2007 CanWest Interactive, a division of CanWest MediaWorks Publications Inc.

Posted: June 14, 2007 Comments (0)

SASK - 120th Edition: On Line Review

The Problem Gambling Community Program purpose is to strengthen the
capacity of communities to respond to the negative impacts of
gambling. The program works in collaboration with Saskatchewan Health
to assist in the delivery of the public education and community
development components of Saskatchewan’ s problem gambling program.

120th Edition: British Support for `Net Reform, Antigua and WTO
Challenge and B.C. Lottery Action

1) Selling Sex and Gambling

“Playboy Casino uses the Cryptologic software, which automatically
puts them in the running to be the best online casino. Cryptologic is
the provider that became famous when they introduced the most advanced
games, the Marvel Slots, to the world, and it is also the network
provider of the Millionaire Club Progressive Slot that earlier this
month paid out more than $8 million to an online player.”

http://tinyurl.com/yrzmjb

It seems that sex and gambling continue to play on mutual marketing
schemes. Has it always been so? Probably, however there comes a time
when pathology and impulse control issues need to be addressed . . .as
in the following case . . .

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has ordered the firm behind
Poker.com to stop advertising online gambling as likely to provide
access to sexual favors . . .

http://tinyurl.com/222ofl

2) `Net Bill Support Across the Pond

Two U.K.-based companies, the UC Group and Baker Tilly Accountants,
recently announced the Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative.
Besides promoting principles of safe, regulated online gambling, the
initiative is also intended to provide information about — and
marshal support for — the Internet Gambling Regulation and
Enforcement Act of 2007 (H.R. 2046) introduced by Rep. Barney Frank
(D-MA) on April 26th.

http://tinyurl.com/2hx429

3) Antigua Continues to Chase Goliath: On Line Betting

Antigua and Barbuda has appealed to other WTO Members to help make it
harder for the US to avoid complying with dispute rulings against
Washington’s restrictions on foreign-based Internet gambling.
WTO dispute panels and the Appellate Body have, in a series of
decisions, agreed with Antigua’s complaint that the US’ multilateral
commitments to liberalize its “recreational services” sector prevent
it from legally shutting its borders to overseas-based internet
gambling operators. The US has insisted that it would continue to
maintain the barriers, prompting Antigua to question the efficacy of
WTO dispute settlement for small economies.
Washington has maintained that it never meant to open its market to
cross-border gambling when scheduling its commitments during the
Uruguay Round, and thus should not be penalized. Therefore, it says
that it need not provide compensation to countries that might one day
be negatively affected by the change, even though GATS Article XXI
requires Members to do so when seeking to alter their commitments. It
has sought to justify its restrictions by arguing that they are
necessary to protect public morals - as permitted by WTO rules under
certain circumstances.

Ed. Note: Is the `morals’ argument a case of the selective U.S.
reading of the WTO legislation being selectively high minded when it
meets narrow U.S. economic needs (with exceptions for various
loopholes wide enough for a prairie plow wind to blow through??)

http://tinyurl.com/23q9yp

4) Winning Fair and Square: A Report on the British Columbia Lottery
Corporation’ s Prize Payout Process

Thanks to Steve Christensen for passing on this link . . .noting some
key terms for the reader BCLC (British Columbia Lottery Corporation)
and GPEB (Gaming Policy Enforcement Branch)

I quote from the Ombudsman Kim Carter and the 142-page report:

“As this report demonstrates more still needs to be done to achieve
the fairness, strict accountability and transparency that BCLC itself
says it considers indispensable to its successful operation.

Our findings identify the deficiencies and our 27 recommendations are
designed to set out what needs to be done so that the rightful owners
of winning tickets can be confident that they receive the correct
prize . . .”

“It is always tempting to look for simple solutions. Prohibiting
retailer and retailer employees from playing BCLC lottery games is one
such solution. That, however, would punish the many honest retailers
and retailer employees – the people who responded to our survey and
themselves recommended improvements to the prize payout procedures.
The recommendations we make may seem less dramatic, but are designed
to more
effectively fill the gaps in the current system.”

http://tinyurl.com/2a9355

5) New South Wales Survey: Young Men Challenged

The survey involved 5,000 people. Single men aged between 18 and 24,
who left school at year 10, are most likely to have the biggest
problem according to the survey.
The Chairman of the Responsible Gambling Fund, the Reverend Harry
Herbert, has cautioned against complacency, despite the research
finding the rate of problem gambling has fallen. “Point eight per
cent of the population in New South Wales does amount to more than
40,000 people, so it still remains a serious problem,” he said.
“Two point four per cent of the population, a much larger group have
got serious risks of gambling problems.”

http://tinyurl.com/2d6omv

Posted: June 1, 2007 Comments (0)

SK - “Make gaming talks (with Federation of Sask. Indian Nations) transparent”

Randy Burton, The StarPhoenix, Thursday, May 17, 2007

It’s no surprise that the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations (FSIN) should demand all of the money rolling into the casinos it operates throughout the province.

After all, Lawrence Joseph began his tenure as FSIN chief last November by threatening to scrap his organization’s gaming agreement with the provincial government altogether. Making demands for all of the revenue can only be good politics for him.

What is surprising is that the province would refuse to spell out its guiding principles in talks aimed at negotiating a new five-year gambling agreement.

It refuses to say anything about what it is prepared to offer the FSIN until after it has signed off on a new deal. In other words, the government will tell the public what’s happening with public money only after the decisions have been made.

It would be useful for folks to know what the stakes are in advance.

While the FSIN ignores this fact, Native-run casinos in Saskatchewan were established as a partnership between First Nations and the government.

Back in 1995, the province agreed to end a standoff over gaming jurisdiction by allowing the FSIN to build four casinos — at White Bear, Yorkton, Prince Albert and North Battleford. Two more are in the works now on the Whitecap reserve and in Swift Current.

The government gave the FSIN an effective monopoly over casinos outside of Regina and Moose Jaw and later extended it to the Saskatoon market. In exchange, the government retained jurisdiction over gambling and took 37.5 per cent of the profits.

That’s some $15 million a year the FSIN would like to keep. So when it talks about getting the government out of its casino operations, the implicit message is that things would go on just as they are now, except the government would get no money out of it.

As sweet as this would be for the FSIN, it’s a remote prospect. Whether the FSIN cares to consider it or not, such a fundamental change to the gaming agreement would have far-reaching implications.

If the province were to lose its share of revenue from First Nations casinos, then the idea of a partnership would die. It follows that if there is no further partnership, the question of a monopoly would also have to be revisited.

It simply makes no sense to give one group the exclusive right to run casinos and exclude every other interested operator, unless the province as a whole reaps some benefit from the arrangement. That benefit evaporates as soon as the province loses its share of gaming revenue.

So if the present agreement with the FSIN is to be torn up, there is no reason for government to prevent others, such as charitable groups, from establishing their own casinos. This would represent more of a mixed approach to gaming, a model used by the government of Alberta and others.

Obviously, this would mean competition for the First Nations casinos in the communities in which they already operate. Some would no doubt survive. Others might not.

This is the very scenario the provincial government sought to avoid when it first struck a deal with the FSIN back in the early 1990s. With no limits, there could be a casino on every reserve, and in every city and some small towns, too, for that matter.

If you follow this line of thinking very far, you soon realize it is in the FSIN’s best interests to maintain the present partnership.

Protected from competition, the First Nations have an opportunity to make a lot of money. In an open market, it could be a very different story.

If the province is to make any concessions in the current round of negotiations, the question becomes what it is to get in exchange. For example, even 12 years after the beginning of the Saskatchewan casino experiment, there is still inadequate accountability for how reserves spend their share of gaming revenues.

There is no way for an individual band member on a Saskatchewan reserve to find out how a chief and council spend the money they are given by the First Nations Trust, which collects 37.5 per cent of casino revenues. That money is intended to benefit reserve residents. It’s not too much to ask that it be accounted for in detail.

The NDP government has never been able to deliver that, and the Opposition Saskatchewan Party does not care to discuss it, which suggests it would do nothing about it in government either. Only Liberal Leader David Karwacki is willing to take a stand on the issue.

These issues are important, given that existing provincial gaming policy is to help the FSIN achieve full jurisdiction over gaming. That would require amendments to the federal Criminal Code which, of course, is beyond the province’s power to deliver.

If that means relinquishing all control over First Nations gaming, the public deserves to know what that’s going to mean before it happens.

© The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) 2007

Posted: May 20, 2007 Comments (0)

SK- “Regina, Moose Jaw casinos have become profit centres”

continued at http://www.responsiblegambling.org/staffsearch/latest_news_articles_details.cfm?intID=10146

Author: Scott, Neil
Source: Regina Leader Post
Published Date: May 05, 2007

Description:
Casino Regina and Casino Moose Jaw just keep chug, chug, chugging along and the profits and customers keep pouring in along the way. Regina hasn’t yet become Las Vegas North and for that matter Moose Jaw hasn’t quite become Saskatchewan’s equivalent to Reno. But the two casinos have produced impressive numbers over the years which suggest they have been big successes. About 16 million customers, equal to almost half the population of Canada, have visited either Casino Regina or Casino Moose Jaw over the years, said Marty Klyne, the president and chief executive officer of the Saskatchewan Gaming Corp.

Posted: Comments (0)

SASK - “Addiction: The dark side of gaming”

more at http://www.responsiblegambling.org/staffsearch/latest_news_articles_details.cfm?intID=10153

Author: French, Janet
Source: Regina Leader Post
Published Date: May 05, 2007

Description:
In Saskatchewan, a 2002 government report says an estimated 1.2 per cent of the province’s population, or between 5,600 to 13,200 adults, are problem gamblers. The telephone survey, performed in 2001 and analysed in the report, “Gambling and Problem Gambling in Saskatchewan,” says another 4.7 per cent of the province, or as many as 42,400 people, are “moderate risk” gamblers, and another 9.3 per cent, or as many as 79,800 adults, are low-risk gamblers. Part of the problem, said Harley Dickinson, a professor and head of sociology at the University of Saskatchewan, is gamblers have a poor understanding of how VLTs and slot machines are programmed to keep players hooked. Dickinson said the government could adopt a better balance between the revenue it gets from gaming and the amount it spends on problems. In 2005-06, the province raked in $69.4 million from casinos alone. $4 million of that money, or less than six per cent, went to treatment and prevention of compulsive gambling, according to the Saskatchewan Liquor and Gaming Authority.

Posted: Comments (0)

SASK - “First Nations gaming deal in works”

Graham Andrews, Saskatchewan News Network, Regina Leader Post, Monday, May 07, 2007

SASKATOON — The provincial government will remain tight-lipped until at least June about negotiations concerning a Saskatchewan First Nations’ plan to keep all of their casino revenues and put video lottery terminals on some reserves.

The bands also have their sights set on what would be Canada’s first agreement to allow First Nations full jurisdiction over their gambling operations.

A top official with the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations (FSIN) said last week that negotiations between the FSIN and the Saskatchewan Liquor and Gaming Authority (SLGA) will continue until June. Vice-Chief Morley Watson said the FSIN, which operates the Saskatchewan Indian Gaming Authority (SIGA), wants to keep all the profits from its casinos.

Contributions from SIGA’s four casinos to the provincial government are expected to equal $15.4 million this year.

The First Nations gaming authority is also scheduled to open two more casinos in 2007, one at Whitecap Dakota Nation just outside Saskatoon and another in Swift Current.

“Unfortunately, we have to give $15 million to the province,” Watson said last week.

“Our First Nations leaders and communities feel that should be put back into developing our communities. “We want to be able to retain more of our profits that we earn.”

Deb Higgins, the NDP minister responsible for SLGA, was not available for comment, but a spokesperson said the government won’t reveal any details of the negotiations until after discussions have ended.

“During the current agreement, both parties have agreed that the negotiations won’t be brought up to the media,” said SLGA spokesman David Morris.

“The discussions are ongoing and we’re not prepared to discuss those.”

If there are any major developments, Morris said, they will be announced after negotiations conclude.

Under the current agreement between the province and the FSIN, casinos operated by SIGA give 37.5 per cent of their profits to the provincial government. The First Nations Trust Fund, which was established in 2002 by the province and the FSIN, also receives 37.5 per cent of profits from those casinos. The remaining approximately 25 per cent of profits from SIGA’s casino profits go to the community development corporations associated with each of the four First Nations-run casinos.

In return for SIGA’s contributions to the province, the First Nations Trust Fund receives 25 per cent of casino revenues from the government-run casinos in Regina and Moose Jaw, which is expected to amount to an $8.4-million injection to the fund this year for a total trust fund balance of about $26.5 million.

In addition to keeping more money from First Nations-run casinos, Watson said SIGA wants the right to put video lottery terminals onto reserves where people can’t easily get to a casino, and where the chief and council would allow them. Eventually, FSIN wants total authority over its gaming, Watson said.

“We also want to look at having full jurisdiction over gaming, but that’s going to take a little bit of time,” he said, adding that, in order for that to happen, permission would have to be granted from the federal government and changes would need to be made to legislation such as the Canadian Criminal Code.

No other province’s First Nations have any similar jurisdiction over gaming, and SLGA’s Morris said he wasn’t aware of any proposals in other provinces.

As part of the 25-year gaming agreement between the province and FSIN, reviews are held every five years. Through that agreement, the provincial government has pledged to help First Nations develop proposals seeking full gaming jurisdiction from the federal government.

A SPECIAL REPORT ON GAMING AND FIRST NATIONS

With new First Nations-run casinos opening soon in Swift Current and south of Saskatoon, the gaming industry in Saskatchewan is about to get even bigger. In a special report on gaming and First Nations, which will appear in tomorrow’s newspaper, the Leader-Post and Saskatoon Star-Phoenix examine the industry and how it is affecting the province.

© The Leader-Post (Regina) 2007

Posted: May 8, 2007 Comments (0)

SK - “City supports new First Nation casino”

Karen Brownlee, Leader-Post, Published: Saturday, May 05, 2007

SWIFT CURRENT — The elders crossed the 10 acres of dry, cracked earth where Saskatchewan’s final casino is to be built so they could offer tobacco to the spirits to ensure the project runs smoothly and its benefits are realized.

When they returned, one of the elders began reciting a prayer. As he spoke, raindrops dotted the earth as well as the 100 people gathered around him.

Those raindrops were significant to Chief Alice Pahtayken of the Nekaneet First Nation.

“The elders always tell us when there are raindrops that means the spirits are honouring us,” she told those gathered in a conference room of a nearby hotel following the elders’ ceremony and the groundbreaking for the Living Sky Casino.

Nekaneet is one of 11 First Nations in the File Hills Qu’Appelle Tribal Council that bought the land for the Living Sky Casino. Together with the City of Swift Current, the Saskatchewan Indian Gaming Authority and the Government of Saskatchewan, they have gotten the project through most of the approval processes. It will be another 18 months until the casino opens, but the benefits and challenges are already being felt.

The idea for the casino came from business people in Swift Current looking to revitalize the city’s economy about seven years ago.

“At that time, our economy was very stagnant,” said Swift Current Mayor Sandy Larson. “We were hoping we could get something to draw people off the highway.”

While the idea of a casino had been tossed around before, Larson said it wasn’t until local hotel owner Bill Thacker called SIGA in the summer of 2000 that someone did more than talk about it.

Edmund Bellegarde remembers Thacker’s call. At the time, Bellegarde was the CEO of SIGA, but is now the tribal chairman of the File Hills Qu’Appelle Tribal Council. It wasn’t something SIGA had considered, so Bellegarde said he’d talk to others.

Two years later, the project found momentum. SIGA officials wanted to know what other ventures the city was interested in pursuing. That caught the attention of the Swift Current Allied Arts Council. For decades, they wanted a home so local, national and international artists performing in the city had a more appropriate venue.

“A stand-alone facility would have cost $12 (million) to $15 million,” said Larson. “A city our size could never afford a facility like that. It was a win-win situation for everyone.”

Selling a casino to the community was something Bellegarde and SIGA knew was vital to the process. The gaming agreement the provincial government has with the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations requires the community and municipality to support the project before the Saskatchewan Liquor and Gaming Authority will approve it.

“The community sometimes has a ‘not in my backyard’ attitude. It takes a lot of patience (and) a lot of perseverance to educate the public that we’re not in this just for profit-taking,” said Bellegarde, who was with SIGA until early 2006.

One way SIGA’s casinos give back is through their Community Development Corporations. One-quarter of casino net profits are provided to the CDCs to be dispersed to the hundreds of organizations working on health, justice, education, recreation, culture, and infrastructure initiatives.

Another portion of SIGA’s net profits go to the provincial government’s general revenue fund that pays for the province’s education, health, highways and other systems. In 2005-06, that was 37.5 per cent of SIGA’s $40.2-million net income.

Still Bellegarde knew not everyone was going to be in favour, but in 2003, he found enough were. A plebiscite held that year found 55 per cent of voters supported the casino. Bellegarde was in Swift Current on election night to monitor the results.

“Some of our supporters were a little disappointed that (support) wasn’t stronger,” he said.

“I reminded them that evening that at the start, 35 per cent of the public are opposed to gambling activity of any kind … Of the remaining 65 per cent, we got a very strong mandate.”

Bellegarde could tell the community was not only getting behind the casino, but also the aboriginal people involved in the project. While he says the southwest region has significant meaning for our province’s aboriginal people, their numbers are low in Swift Current. In 2001, Statistics Canada recorded 285 aboriginal people living in the city of 15,000.

For a week in October 2004, their numbers swelled when the FSIN held its fall assembly in Swift Current. That week, Bellegarde said businesses around the city posted signs welcoming the chiefs and residents greeted them on the street.

It was also that week Premier Lorne Calvert announced in Swift Current his government was approving the casino. Less than three months later, his government approved an amendment to the gaming agreement.

“We feel the market is at a saturation point,” said SLGA Minister Deb Higgins. “It would be pretty difficult if not impossible to approve anything else … In the foreseeable future, this is it — the last casino we can see being approved for Saskatchewan.”

To buy the land for the casino, the 11 First Nations of the File Hills Qu’Appelle Tribal Council each contributed an equal share of funds. Those First Nations are Carry the Kettle, Little Black Bear, Muscowpetung, Okanese, Pasqua, Peepeekisis, Piapot, Standing Buffalo, Star Blanket, Wood Mountain and Nekaneet. A parcel of land just off the Trans-Canada Highway was purchased making Living Sky the only casino in Saskatchewan next to Canada’s main highway.

“The market is 100 miles around the casino, but because we’re on the Trans-Canada Highway, there is access to one million cars that pass by the site (every year),” said Bellegarde. “We feel we’re going to attract people internationally from down south and from across Western Canada, but a lot of people from the East Coast make their trip across Canada on the Trans-Canada.”

The tribal council will finance the construction of the building while SIGA will manage the exterior and interior design and furnishings and then operate the facility. The casino will have 220 slot machines and 10 table games. In the multi-function theatre, there will be seating for 600.

Story boards will explain the 11 First Nations as well as the five linguistic groups in the File Hills Qu’Appelle Tribal Council. The building will also reflect southwest Saskatchewan, including natural materials found in the area.

“When our elders chose (the name) Living Sky, it fit the landscape,” said Bellegarde.

“This territory, the Cypress Hills Region, has a lot of history for us both from a spiritual and cultural context to a hunting and winter haven context. Cypress Hills is a sacred park.”

It was decided Nekaneet would ensure the casino’s land becomes an urban reserve. While Nekaneet is an hour and a half away from Swift Current near the Alberta border, it is the closest First Nation to the city.

Last year, Nekaneet signed a municipal services agreement with the City of Swift Current, one of the steps in creating an urban reserve. Another step is a ratification vote in July. If 50 per cent plus one of Nekaneet’s eligible voters agree to turn the land into an urban reserve, the matter goes to Indian Affairs for the federal minister to approve.

All other approvals are in place. Saskatchewan Liquor and Gaming has approved the $35-million construction cost of building the 50,000-square-foot facility. Financing for the project is in place with Concentra Financial and the Bank of Montreal.

Construction is to begin in June. That is one of the project’s challenges. Swift Current is growing rapidly and construction labour for other projects, such as the newly built regional hospital, has at times been difficult to find.

“Graham Construction is the general contractor for the project,” said Bellegarde. “Trailers and workers will be moving down onto the site later this summer. We hope that their database of labour and their experience in Saskatchewan in projects as large as this will certainly pay off.”

Finding enough aboriginal workers will also be a challenge, but he feels SIGA can manage.

Not only will the tourists bring new money to the city, but so will the employees moving there. FSIN Vice-Chief Morley Watson points to Yorkton’s Painted Hand Casino’s 200 employees earning a combined $7 million to show what is possible for Swift Current.

“Those working people support the community by purchasing goods and services — homes, vehicles, furniture, electronics and the list goes on,” he said.

Finding enough places for the employees to live is another challenge. The housing market in Swift Current is tight with new subdivisions being completed. “We’re going to come up with some creative options that we’ll be unveiling as the project continues,” said Bellegarde.

Another challenge exists in the community. While some may be concerned about problem gambling with the introduction of the casino, one Swift Current man says it is already there.

John attends Gamblers Anonymous meetings in Swift Current. Last April he realized his spending on VLTs was soon going to cost him his house and possibly his relationship with his daughter.

“They’re in every restaurant and every bar in the city,” said John, who didn’t share his last name just as he doesn’t at his meetings. “They’re everywhere. You just have to get used to them being around. The casino isn’t going to change that.”

John is certain many more in Swift Current need help than the three others who attend meetings with him. Higgins agrees and says resources are there.

“About two per cent of the gaming population have a problem,” said Higgins. “Saskatchewan has about the second-highest per-capita spending on problem gambling (in Canada).”

John first called the province’s Problem Gambling Helpline. While he could have participated in a day treatment program in Regina, he chose instead to initiate the Gamblers Anonymous group in Swift Current.

While amendments to the gaming agreement for the Dakota Dunes Casino provide another $500,000 for problem gambling programs for First Nations, there aren’t any additional resources associated with the Living Sky Casino. In all, $4.5 million will be spent on problem gambling in the province once Dakota Dunes opens.

As the partners in the project wait for the opening of the Living Sky Casino still many months away, their excitement continues to build.

“The unique partnership with the File Hills Qu’Appelle Tribal Council, Nekaneet First Nation, SIGA and the government of Saskatchewan will create significant possibilities for our community to expand and grow,” said Larson.

But others say the benefits go beyond the city’s limits.

As Saskatchewan’s aboriginal population continues to grow — by 2045, 40 per cent of our province’s people will be First Nations — the FSIN’s Watson says all of Saskatchewan’s people need to continue to working together on projects like the casinos.

“We need to take every opportunity to generate an economy that is needed for tomorrow … This project is not just for First Nations, but for everyone,” said Watson.

“We want to build a better future and of course, hope, for our young people that Saskatchewan is a dynamic, progressive and willing partner for First Nations for a better tomorrow.”

Posted: May 5, 2007 Comments (0)