NZ - Welcome decrease in pokie numbers

Press Release
Welcome decrease in pokie numbers [24.01.07]

“A decrease in the number of New Zealand pokies is welcome news,” says John Stansfield, CEO for the Problem Gambling Foundation of New Zealand (PGF).

Latest figures from the Department of Internal Affairs show that numbers of pokies in pubs and clubs have decreased of 3.9% in the 2006 calendar year.

“We congratulate the Department for its work in regulating the sector and enforcing regulations on harmful venues. Local councils with a sinking-lid gambling venue policy - which prevents the replacement of machines that have ceased operating - are also congratulated. These councils are using the provisions of the Gambling Act to protect their communities by reducing the number of pokies,” says Mr Stansfield.

“However, there are still far too many pokies in our communities, often in the poorest areas and are causing too much harm,” he says.

“Problem gambling affects not only individuals, but also their partners and children, wider family/whanau, friends, colleagues and the wider community. Pokie machines account for 90% of people who walk through our doors for treatment.

“These machines were foisted on communities who were powerless to stop them. The Gambling Act provides local authorities with an opportunity to reduce the number of pokies by introducing a sinking-lid policy. We believe that it is their responsibility to take measures to reduce the number of pokies by having gambling policies that protect communities from these destructive machines.”

For more information please contact John Stansfield on (027) 448 1520.

Posted: January 24, 2007 Comments (0)

On Line Gambling and Problem Gambling Review: 112th Edition: Impact on Teens, Neteller Takes Hit, Internet Gambling in the U.S.

The Problem Gambling Community Program purpose is to strengthen the
capacity of communities to respond to the negative impacts of
gambling. The program works in collaboration with Saskatchewan Health
to deliver the public education and community development components
of Saskatchewan’ s problem gambling program.

Bill Ursel
Director

On Line Gambling and Problem Gambling Review
112th Edition: Impact on Teens, Neteller Takes Hit, Internet Gambling
in the U.S.-Current Legislation

1) Impact on Teenagers: Stakes Continue to Be High

The Towncrier shares this series of anecdotal accounts. The narrative
provides valuable perspectives on the impact of gambling with youth . . .

“TJ Nathaniel, a 19-year-old former Oakwood Collegiate student, says
he’s been gambling since he was about 15 or 16. He began playing poker
on the Internet at 17, even though the legal age for online betting is
18. His style of poker is No-Limit Texas Hold ‘Em. He used to play at
least five times a week, then stopped for a short while when the site
he frequented closed down. He eventually moved on to an-other one.”

http://tinyurl. com/ysejms
2) British Treatment Guide

Mark Griffiths is the contributing author of this guide developed for
the British Medical Association. Significant sections include core
definitions, support and treatment and references to Internet and
remote gambling. Griffiths notes (p. 19) . . .
“very recent studies using self-selected samples suggest that the
prevalence of problem
gambling among internet gamblers is relatively high (Griffiths &
Barnes, 2005; Wood, Griffiths & Parke, in press). What is clear,
however, is that online gambling has strong potential to facilitate,
or even encourage, problematic gambling behaviour (Griffiths, 2003c).”

http://tinyurl. com/yhkwjr

3) Neteller Takes Hit via U.S. Legislation

The arrest of its founders January 15/07 on U.S. soil on money
laundering charges and the company’s (Neteller) delicate position as a
publicly traded British company forced it to cease handling U.S.
betting transfers as of January 18, 2007.

http://tinyurl. com/2yp5pm

Senator Bill Frist and others have been unusually quiet about recent
action. The October rise and passage of the Unlawful Internet
Gambling Enforcement Act has led to a range of action against Neteller
and other on line gambling processing firms and actual gambling sites.
This response by Frist comes early in October 2006 . . .in the
Baptist Press.

http://tinyurl. com/2fktvf

Larry Rutherford of Casino Gambling Web provides his take on the Frist
article here . . .

http://tinyurl. com/26bhnl

PokerNews writer Stephen Noh writes on January 19/07 that the impact
may not be as extreme as some observers indicate. He highlights
Epassporte and Click2Pay as sites being ready to fill the breach . . .
He notes concerns with each from a players perspective . . .

“One frequent complaint from Epassporte users is the amount of hidden
fees that they attach – for instance, their load/reload fee is $5 per
$100 deposit and in order to withdraw funds, you need to purchase a
$35 electron card with a $2 fee for withdrawal or do an Electronic
Funds Transfer (EFT).”

“Click2Pay offers deposit/withdrawals through credit card or bank
transfer. Unlike Epassporte, Click2Pay does not charge a fee on
deposits made directly from your bank account. It does, however,
charge a 3% fee on deposits made using your credit/debit card.”

http://tinyurl. com/2gko6c

The murky waters of jurisprudence tells many tales. The arguments of
law could make all of our heads spin . . .however Tom Jones on Casino
Gambling provides several opinions on the matter . . .

http://tinyurl. com/yqutz8

My concern with the host of options is the dizzying pace of `ease’
being presented to on line gamblers. One site down, another two,
three or more stepping in to address consumer `need’. Responsible
action on the part of on line business would call for monitoring of
sites for illegal fees and problem gambling behaviour. There seems
little time and effort given to proactive vision on the part of those
making significant profit at the expense of players, their families,
employers and communities.

4) U.S. Internet Legislation . . .Winding Road

A thumbnail of the related legislation may be helpful to clarify the
current U.S. firestorm/reaction/ impact.

The initiatives run back perhaps 10 years. Various representatives in
the U.S. congress lobby to add teeth to the 1961 Federal Wire Wager
Act. Jeffrey Rodefer provides his review of the legislation . . .

http://www.gambling -law-us.com/ Federal-Laws/ wire-act. htm

Various initiatives and debates took place. That debate leads to
H.R. 4411 The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2005 . . .

http://www.govtrack .us/congress/ bill.xpd? bill=h109- 4411

Various revisions and further debate leads to P.L. 109-347 The
Security and Accountability For Every Port Act. The eleventh hour
procedures raised concerns and many eyebrows with the passage of this
bill . . .

http://tinyurl. com/2me8w2

The relevant section TITLE VIII–UNLAWFUL INTERNET GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT
SEC. 801. SHORT TITLE.

http://tinyurl. com/3da2nt

5) British Gambling Act

The British Gambling Act 2005 may be found at the following link. It
appears that being verbose is a gift shared by both American and
British lawmakers. This act has 362 subsections and 18 `schedules’.
Those schedules provide varied aspects and definitions of law. The
implications are outlined, at other times, there is some latitude for
interpretation.

http://tinyurl. com/2p7jj8

Posted: January 23, 2007 Comments (0)

CAN - United Church of Canada supports Competition Bureau Complaint

from: http://www.gamblingwatchglobal.com/archives/united-church-of-canada-supports-competition-bureau-complaint/

1/23/2007: United Church of Canada supports Competition Bureau Complaint
The United Church of Canada has come out in support of a complaint filed to the Competition Bureau by a group of advocates decrying VL’Ts. The complaintents include Gameplanit, Game over VLTs, Viva Consulting and private citizens concerned about addictive processes. (slightly edited for web)

Subject: United Church interest in Six-Person official Complaint to
Competition Bureau re Electronic Gaming Machines (EGMs), including Slots &
VLTs

Dear ____:
Bill Clark has recently forwarded me information about the complaint to the
Competition Bureau about gaming machines. Please keep me informed or advised
in any way that The United Church of Canada can support Canada’s Gambling
Watch Network. The United Church is very concerned about governments
addiction to gambling and social costs.

Peace
Richard Chambers
Associate Executive Minister
Justice, Global and Ecumenical Relations The United Church of Canada

Posted: Comments (0)

ON - “New method for slots panned”

Tue, January 23, 2007

Going from tokens to paper slips won’t help addicted gamblers or staff, a watchdog says.

By JOE BELANGER AND PAT MALONEY, London FREE PRESS REPORTERS

A gambling watchdog says new slot machine technology being used at Western Fair Slots fuels gambling addictions and will likely lead to layoffs.

But the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. defended its switch from the use of tokens to tickets for payouts as a “customer-driven” industry standard used at casinos around the world.

“The bottom line — you’re going to lose jobs at the casinos and it’s just another increase of the addiction potential of the machine,” said Roger Horbay, gambling technology adviser to Canada’s Gambling Watch Network.

continued ….

Further, said Horbay, the definition of a slot machine in the Criminal Code of Canada refers to the use of tokens.

“They can’t call them slot machines anymore because they’re not dispensing tokens,” Horbay said.

continued ….
Copyright © 2006, Canoe Inc.

Posted: Comments (0)

Issue 19 of the Journal of Gambling Issues (url)

at http://www.camh.net/egambling/

Posted: January 22, 2007 Comments (0)

AB - “VLTs labelled unfair - Watchdog group lodges complaint with Competition Bureau” quotes

By BROOKES MERRITT, EDMONTON SUN, Fri, January 19, 2007

“VLTs break a slew of federal fair trade laws and are designed to trick you into thinking you’re always on the verge of hitting a jackpot, says a Canadian gambling watchdog.

The Gambling Watch Network has filed a federal complaint with the Competition Bureau alleging electronic gaming machines (EGMs) aren’t regulated to ensure fairness. ” ….

“People need to be forewarned before they play these machines. Our government vouches for their integrity when they know very little about the software behind the screens,” said Garry Smith of the Alberta Gaming Research Institute. ….

The watchdog group alleges EGMs do not meet Canadian standards of consumer fairness, fraud or protection. ” …

article continued ….

Copyright © 2006, Canoe Inc.

Posted: January 20, 2007 Comments (0)

Gambling epidemic warning from BMA

By Nazia Parveen, Newsquest Media Group, Friday 19th January 2007

“Gambling can lead to depression and alcoholism, according to a new report published by the British Medical Association (BMA) this week.

It comes a fortnight before Blackpool finds out if it has been selected to have the country’s first regional casino.

The BMA report warned that Britain is already heading toward a gambling epidemic, with women and youngsters most “at risk”.”

continued …

The BMA report is available if you go to their website.

Posted: Comments (0)

for whistle-blowers (url)

at http://www.wikileaks.org/index.html

Posted: Comments (0)

US (PA) - The dirty little secret of slots

Wednesday, Jan 17, 2007, The Times Leader

There’s no way to know what chance you have of winning on specific machine or spin.

By TOM AVRIL Philadelphia Inquirer Staff Writer

See how slot machines work

BENSALEM - Gerrie Zdunkczyk pressed a button and watched the three wheels spin, the seductive lights of the slot machine reflected in her eyeglasses as she sat in a padded chair.

The first wheel stopped spinning, displaying the image of a purple bar. Then the second wheel stopped - another bar. And the third wheel … A blank. But tantalizingly, just one space away, she saw the third bar she needed.

“If that bar had come down here, I would’ve won something,” she said last week, in her first visit to the new slots parlor at PhiladelphiaPark Casino.

Maybe not. Sure, it looked as if the third wheel just ran out of gas when it got close to the winning symbol. But in reality, it stopped there because an internal computer told it to - a result randomly determined when she pressed the button, before the wheels started spinning.

It’s just one way that slot machines - long a fixture in Atlantic City and now in Pennsylvania, with a third parlor to open this month in Chester - are not always what they seem.

For years, the colorful devices have been computerized, with a dizzying array of outcomes to entice the gambler. Often, the odds of hitting a particular symbol vary from one reel to the next, allowing game designers to give users the impression they are close to a winning combination when they are not.

States require that machines pay back a certain amount over the long term - at least 85 percent of what’s wagered in Pennsylvania’s case, 83 percent in New Jersey’s. But if you want to know the exact chance of getting three cherries or some other jackpot, you’re out of luck.

With the exception of certain games - such as video poker, considered a slot machine though it simulates a deck of cards - the odds are secret.

Critics say slots mislead gamblers and foster addiction.

“They think they’re getting close to winning, they’re about to win, they’d better stay on the machine,” said Roger Horbay, a consultant and expert on problem gambling.

Industry officials deny deceiving their customers.

“The outcomes of the games are random,” said Ed Rogich, spokesman for the Nevada-based IGT, which made the Double Diamond slot machine that Zdunkczyk was using.

The industry doesn’t disclose the odds, he said, because state rules don’t require it.

Still, states impose strict rules on the machines.

In Pennsylvania, a team of statisticians, computer scientists and engineers puts each machine through its paces, calculating its theoretical performance, then making sure the device actually plays that way.

The head of the operation is Richard Williamson, a veteran casino investigator whom the state Gaming Control Board hired away from New Jersey.

Williamson’s staff ensures that the 85 percent rule is followed and that the machines aren’t too “volatile” - that is, they reach that threshold within 10 million plays.

Statistician Nimish Purohit uses a spreadsheet to run the numbers for each machine. Earlier this month, he calculated that one machine had a theoretical payout of 85.9 percent.

In practice, most slots are designed to be more generous - often above 90 percent - to keep gamblers playing. But the state does not allow payouts above 100 percent; otherwise, the government would have no casino profits to tax.

So in the long run - and often in the short run - the gambler always loses. With the exception of certain skill games such as video poker, there is no real strategy, said Anthony Curtis, president of lasvegasadvisor.com, a gambling Web site.

“It’s blind luck,” Curtis said. “Any person who plays a slot machine needs to go into it looking at it as an entertainment expense, just as they would look at going to the movies.”

In interviews last week at PhiladelphiaPark with half a dozen gamblers, most seemed pretty savvy. Zdunkczyk, a retiree from Churchville, agreed that strategies didn’t work. I have no scheme, no plan, she said, playing a Double Diamond.

“Yet some fall victim to the gambler’s fallacy - the idea that if a machine hasn’t paid out money for a while, it is due, ” said Bill Eadington, director of a gambling study institute at the University of Nevada, Reno.

“If I feel like I’ve played it long enough, I’ll start doubling up on my bets,” said Rebecca Bock, 60, a Northeast Philadelphia resident playing All That Glitters.

That won’t help.

Slots are simply a more complicated version of flipping a coin. If you get 10 heads in a row, you are not any more likely to get tails on the next flip. The chance of tails is the same as when you started: 50 percent.

So can you get rich on the slots?

Fat chance.

On the Web

Gamblers wagered more than $250 million on slot machines at Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs in less than two months. According to the state gaming control board, wagers totaled $251,561,284 from the mid-November opening through Jan. 7. Payouts totaled $226,389,004, leaving 10 percent or $25,172,280 with the casino operator, the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority. Daily revenue per machine has run well over $400 at times, handily beating pre-opening estimates and a higher rate than PhiladelphiaPark Casino, which opened in mid-December.

For a complete explanation on how slot machines determine payouts, go to www.timesleader.com .

Copyright 2007 The Times Leader.

Posted: January 18, 2007 Comments (0)

Canadians charged in online gambling case

Larry Neumeister

Associated Press, Toronto Star, January 16, 2007

NEW YORK -

“Two founders of a company which processes Internet gambling transactions were arrested and charged with laundering billions of dollars in gambling proceeds, U.S. federal prosecutors announced Tuesday.

The charges against the former Neteller PLC directors, John David Lefebvre, 55, and Stephen Eric Lawrence, 46, both Canadian citizens, were contained in two criminal complaints unsealed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan on Monday, U.S. Attorney Michael Garcia said in a statement.

The prosecutor said the men knew when they took their company public that its activities were illegal.

“Blatant violations of U.S. law are not a mere `risk’ to be disclosed to prospective investors,” Garcia said. “Criminal prosecutions related to online gambling will be pursued even in cases where assets and defendants are positioned outside of the United States.”

FBI assistant director Mark Mershon said the multibillion-dollar online gambling industry was “a colossal criminal enterprise masquerading as legitimate business.”‘ Continued …..

Posted: Comments (0)